CO129-511-7 Watchmen Ordinance- 1928- petition against certain clauses 18-5-1928 - 21-11-1928 — Page 5

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

5

? Any legal sbrows.

Have

you any

irewo

D

710/7/20

ora

§ 11?

I have no observations which are

'legal' because the Ordinance adequately

carries out its purpose. The purpose appears

to me to be of a dubious character, but I

gather that you intend to deal with that.

If the Ordinance is accepted, I do not think

you need take exception to Section 11, as it

only applies to police watchmen.

The petitioners cannst

leasonally

clain

to represent

300

to place

without gellung

Thren

under

Their

Ihe petition. We have

Im

of judging how

represent.

The situation has

no

signatures (or cuarks,

шаму

Inhu

They really do

7

Course Co

completety

changed

Indians

since (817.

ayarded

ut of India

wen

seditions and

Some holle

Sundhwara

sedition is

M

in fact

At that time all

مة

potentially

Ithong had had

in connection

Sikh temple. Nowadago Indian

not in 457

The

foreground, and

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.